Not all shareholders are created equal— at least when it comes to voting rights. While some companies take a “one share, one vote” approach to shareholder decision-making, others give disproportionate voting rights to founders or choose to offer multiple share classes, each with different voting power.
Companies have been offering shares with different voting rights for decades. Multi-class shares are common around the world, not just a phenomenon of Silicon Valley.
Strong arguments can be made on both sides of this issue: in favor and against the practice of offering shares with differential voting rights. Ensuring that founders and key decision-makers have extra voting heft might insulate them from short-term market demands, thus helping them focus on long-term goals. Yet, concentrating voting power in a few hands could also become a way for insiders to entrench their positions and suppress legitimate concerns from other owners.
FCLTGlobal is particularly interested in testing the oft-used argument that multi-class shares promote long-term behavior and outperformance. Absent definitive evidence, arguments on this topic often focus disproportionately on the most high-profile, recent examples of companies using multiple share classes, which makes it hard to appreciate the full breadth, history, and market impact of differential voting rights.
To enrich the debate, FCLTGlobal partnered with researchers at the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business, who have a unique dataset covering companies that issue shares with different voting rights. We found that:
Power Play: The Long-term Impact of Multi-class Shares provides a fuller explanation of these findings, beginning with a broader look at the practice of issuing multiple share class—and followed by a detailed account of FCLTGlobal’s statistical approach and findings.
In the News
20 August 2026 - Some people just have a bad sense of direction, and many of them run big organizations. Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh is conceding the limitations of publicly mapping out the near future. Corporate bosses, however, stubbornly keep trying to navigate investors around the next corner. They often wind up getting everyone lost.
Investor-Corporate Engagement | Article
28 July 2026 - What a record year of shareholder activism reveals about the companies that get targeted — and the ones that don’t
Regulatory Submission
14 July 2026 - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking public comment on exchange-traded funds (ETFs) seeking to invest in innovative asset classes or engage in novel investment strategies.