This research, conducted in collaboration with MSCI Institute and leveraging data from MSCI Solutions, examines how director equity ownership shapes long-term outcomes across more than 2,100 global public companies. The findings are clear and consistent across markets: when directors — particularly independent directors — hold meaningful, sustained equity stakes, companies deliver stronger long-term performance. 

Download Report





Acknowledgements

FCLTGlobal’s work benefited from the insights and advice drawn from FCLTGlobal’s members and other organizations. We are grateful for the insights of all our project collaborators:

Jonathan Ponder | MSCI

Across our analysis, companies with increasing and durable board ownership significantly outperformed over a five-year period. A sustained rise in director equity ownership over that timeframe is associated with: 

The data also highlights what happens when ownership declines. Companies where independent directors reduced their holdings saw materially weaker outcomes, including: 

Beyond returns, the research shows that board ownership is linked to how companies make decisions. Higher director ownership is associated with greater investment in innovation, with roughly 3 percent higher R&D intensity relative to revenue. At the same time, companies where directors hold more equity than executives exhibit significantly lower volatility — reduced by more than 50 percent over five years. 

Taken together, the evidence points to a broader conclusion: when directors have meaningful, sustained exposure to long-term outcomes, boards appear better positioned to support disciplined capital allocation, maintain strategic focus, and invest through cycles. 

Yet despite these findings, board equity ownership remains uncommon: Nearly one-fifth of companies in the MSCI ACWI have no director ownership, and 94 percent of companies did not have a formal equity ownership policy for directors at the time of this study. 

Furthermore, directors’ equity is often structured in ways that limit its effectiveness. The report explores why this gap persists and outlines practical steps for designing ownership structures that reinforce long-term alignment — emphasizing scale, duration, balance with executive ownership, and investor support.

Governance | Toolkit

Board Ownership Design Checklist

13 April 2026 - This toolkit will help boards and compensation committees assess whether board ownership provides durable, meaningful exposure aligned with long-term value creation.

Learn More

Governance | Toolkit

Board Conversation Guide: Linking Ownership to Strategy

13 April 2026 - This toolkit is designed to support structured board-level discussion on how ownership connects to the company’s purpose, time horizon, and governance responsibilities.

Learn More

Governance | Toolkit

Investor Questionnaire on Board Ownership

13 April 2026 - This toolkit is intended to help long-term investors evaluate board ownership as a governance mechanism.

Learn More

This research builds on FCLTGlobal’s broader work on long-term governance and incentives, offering both evidence and practical frameworks for boards and investors seeking to strengthen alignment with long-term value creation:

Governance | Article

CEO Tenure is More Important than the CEO-Chair Debate

By Victoria Tellez

28 January 2026 - In governance circles, few topics generate more debate than whether the CEO should also serve as board chair. Regulators in some markets have taken firm positions, and activists often argue that separation between the two roles is a universal best practice.

Learn More

Governance | Report

The Board Playbook: Winning Strategies for Long-Term Value Creation

By Victoria Tellez, Matthew Leatherman

19 May 2025 - Companies — both public and private — strive to build boards that are instrumental in creating long-term value. But boards often feel they must follow somebody else's playbook. As companies grow, especially when they transition from private to public markets, they encounter a set of norms that governance experts expect them to follow. While some of these norms are listing requirements or laws that companies must follow, many are simply conventions rather than mandates.

Learn More

Governance | Article

The Myth of the One Size Fits All Board

By Jess Gaspar

15 April 2024 - There is no one-size-fits-all solution to designing corporate boards for long-term value creation. Recognizing and understanding that choices are available is the first step toward making longer-term choices and establishing next-generation board governance.

Learn More