Asset managers get involved in the companies they own
Index-tracking funds take a more hands-on approach to corporate governance
EXECUTIVES have grown used to being nagged about their company’s strategy and governance by all and sundry. Activist hedge funds targeted 524 companies worldwide between January and June, compared with 570 in the whole of 2013 and 805 in 2017, according to Activist Insight, a research firm. Last year two big index-makers, S&P Dow Jones and FTSE Russell, excluded firms with multiple share classes from their flagship indices. On August 22nd Glass Lewis, a firm of “proxy advisers” which advises shareholders on how to vote, gainsaid the management of Sports Direct by urging the British retailer’s owners to evict its founder, Mike Ashley, from the board. Now hitherto quiescent big asset managers are sticking their oars in as well.
Institutional investors, which own the largest stakes in most listed firms, have conventionally deferred to proxy advisers in matters of corporate governance. A positive recommendation from Glass Lewis or Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the two giants of the shareholder-advice industry, can raise the vote in favour of a motion on board appointments, executive pay and the like by up to 20 percentage points, according to a recent analysis by academics at Stanford University.
This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "Passive, aggressive"
Business September 1st 2018
- China is sprucing up its pharma sector
- YouTube is fighting for a slice of the premium-video market
- Why Indian carriers are losing money
- A disaster leaves a European infrastructure giant on edge
- BMW’s reputation in South Korea goes up in flames
- Asset managers get involved in the companies they own
- Disputes over goodwill can seem arcane
More from Business
Does Perplexity’s “answer engine” threaten Google?
Taking aim at one of the best business models of all times
How not to work on a plane
Hours without interruption and work to do. What could go wrong?
Why does BHP want Anglo American?
Its $39bn takeover offer is the latest in a string of mining mega-mergers